tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-73876013105360466302024-03-08T01:25:19.317+01:00Evolution and CancerStudying cancer as an evolutionary disease. News and reviews about research on cancer and evolution.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.comBlogger91125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-49001911274865656642015-05-29T01:50:00.001+02:002015-05-29T01:50:56.911+02:00Random nonsenseTo test an idea. We are scientists after all!Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-68050432739723845772014-02-04T01:49:00.002+01:002014-02-04T01:49:14.310+01:00WordpressGiving it a go: <a href="http://blog.cancerevo.org/">http://blog.CancerEvo.org</a>David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-80270809268709689442014-01-30T01:15:00.002+01:002014-01-30T01:15:48.717+01:00Raising (a little) money for Cancer Research<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
As much as I like science (doing science or reading about it) I also like running. Luckily running and thinking are quite complementary activities so I do not see the time I spend running as something detracting from my work. Since I arrived to <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/112560198298830276761" target="_blank">+Moffitt Cancer Center</a> in the summer of 2008 I have participated in a charity race called Miles 4 Moffitt.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><span style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><a href="http://www.milesformoffitt.com/" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="118" src="https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1/1374232_562480893832792_1058081995_n.png" width="320" /></a></span></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.milesformoffitt.com/" target="_blank">Miles for Moffitt</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
This event, organised for <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/112560198298830276761" target="_blank">+Moffitt Cancer Center</a>, raises money for local cancer researchers. I know a few of my colleagues that applied and received some of that money and I know how much it helps junior researchers at Moffitt to get a little bit of funding so they can test new ideas that would go untested otherwise. This year I am not only running but also trying to raise a very modest sum of money for this cause.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><span style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><a href="http://www.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=1088017&supId=400183943&extSiteType=4" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4055/4682311498_f744f94677_b.jpg" height="240" width="320" /></a></span></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=1088017&supId=400183943&extSiteType=4" target="_blank">Yours truly on the left with one of the race t-shirts</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
If you live in the Tampa Bay area you should definitely join us on the 10th of May this year. Click on the first image of this post and sign up. But if you cannot make it in person and want to help one way to do this is by donating money to the cause. The following link will take you to the donation page generated for my participation for Miles 4 Moffitt:<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Yours truly: <a href="http://www.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=1088017&supId=400183943&extSiteType=4">http://www.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=1088017&supId=400183943&extSiteType=4</a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Some of my friends and colleagues at Moffitt's IMO are also running and they could do with your help as well:</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=1088017&supId=400173452&extSiteType=2" target="_blank">Heiko Enderling</a>.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=1088017&supId=384554182&extSiteType=2" target="_blank">Alexander ('Sandy') Anderson</a></li>
</ul>
<div>
And that's all really. I am hoping to update the list very soon. I am optimistic about <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/108031687426734406821" target="_blank">+Philip Gerlee</a>, <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/107832620883409249821" target="_blank">+Jacob Scott</a>, <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/102396702858045803711" target="_blank">+Jill Gallaher</a> and maybe <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/112812578668566513622" target="_blank">+Arturo Araujo</a> ?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-54347377468712323262014-01-17T18:51:00.001+01:002014-01-17T18:51:15.500+01:00Get it while it is still fresh! A mathematical model of stem cell-driven tumourigenesisA couple of months ago <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/107832620883409249821" target="_blank">+Jacob Scott</a> and I (as well as <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/101481603301898968209" target="_blank">+Anita Hjelmeland</a> , <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/117393092670662618012" target="_blank">+Prakash Chinaiyan</a> and <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/109422830104234532994" target="_blank">+Alexander Anderson</a> ) got our work accepted in PLOS Computational Biology and finally it is available <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003433" target="_blank">online here</a>.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJKEW1BKR3V4mg6_wzjZ4UavCgZwivArvYhTpk6COBEGW2YzJW5RLA3KOe16ZtRBbTz5LANrQqxTPGyaMXygxatOJXpjubPb8p0KfA_R0WV0opHJE0B-xb0jl55bTTUiBvC2G5UqneRX8/s1600/all425.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJKEW1BKR3V4mg6_wzjZ4UavCgZwivArvYhTpk6COBEGW2YzJW5RLA3KOe16ZtRBbTz5LANrQqxTPGyaMXygxatOJXpjubPb8p0KfA_R0WV0opHJE0B-xb0jl55bTTUiBvC2G5UqneRX8/s1600/all425.png" height="160" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
This is an example of a simulation where on the left you can see the different types of cells (stem in red and non stem in green and blue) as well as blood vessels; whereas on the right you can see the concentration of oxygen (from white where there is abundance to red where there is hypoxia). The work is available to anybody since it is a PLOS paper. <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/107832620883409249821" target="_blank">+Jacob Scott</a> has also produced a nice description on his <a href="http://cancerconnector.blogspot.com/2013/12/investigating-effects-of.html" target="_blank">blog here</a>. So go ahead and take a look if you are interested in mathematical oncology, cancer stem cells, both or either.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Also thanks to <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/109422830104234532994" target="_blank">+Alexander Anderson</a> for this paper. This work started a few years ago when I was a postdoc at his group using a mathematical tool, the hybrid discrete-continuum cellular automaton, that I learned from him. Nonetheless he let me take responsibility for the project while at the same time contributing to it with his expertise and ideas. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Expect to see new results from this model soon, it is difficult to stop <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/107832620883409249821" target="_blank">+Jacob Scott</a> when he has an idea and I am afraid he has quite a few involving versions of this model.</div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-91075467959891245692014-01-13T08:00:00.000+01:002014-01-13T08:00:03.049+01:00Heterogeneity in CMLFollowers of this blog (or even just casual readers) know that heterogeneity is a key aspect of cancer. Not that I am saying that this is my idea, far from it. Many people have championed it in the last few years including my colleague <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/109422830104234532994" target="_blank">+Alexander Anderson</a>. A couple of years ago CRUK's Charles Swanton and his team produced convincing clinical evidence of the existence of phenotypic heterogeneity in kidney cancer [<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17289924" target="_blank">news</a>,<a href="http://www.med.upenn.edu/timm/documents/Minn_NEJMTimmMainarticle.pdf" target="_blank">article</a>] and a lot more people started paying attention. Since then researchers have found evidence of heterogeneity in other types of cancer such as prostate, bone or Barrett's esophagus.<br />
<br />
Why is this important you say (or not...)? Because we are moving towards the use of targeted therapies. Therapies that, for the most part, assume that there are critical *targetable* mutations that all tumour cells share. Sadly this is unlikely to be true for most cancers.<br />
<br />
An exception could be CML or Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, a type of tumour in which I started working recently during the IMO workshop (+Artem Kaznatcheev describes it nicely here [<a href="http://egtheory.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/post-tki-relapse/" target="_blank">link</a>]). Our clinical experts were quite clear that there is no heterogeneity in CML. There is only a key mutation, BCR-ABL, driving CML that if messed with, controls the cancer. That lack of genetic heterogeneity could explain why treatments like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imatinib" target="_blank">imatinib</a> are so effective.<br />
<br />
But it does not work every time, it does not work the same for everybody and even if there is not substantial genetic heterogeneity there are other elements that explain intra-tumour heterogeneity. <a class="g-profile" href="https://plus.google.com/109942155827376648101" target="_blank">+Chandler Gatenbee</a> and I came with this list, which is certainly not exhaustive, during a brainstorming session:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg99pncvhhyphenhyphenU9399jfeFBFgPnm7kb4Nd0CawhRvH-4eO7HIpWjzyYWInegkMT6tiQzcjtrfy9WHeigKeuf9KI3vHiErvN6COZWVI3aOUFm11HFbmBNpj8IvV20am3C-RgWs19_2jcapU5g/s1600/2013-11-21+20.19.27-1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg99pncvhhyphenhyphenU9399jfeFBFgPnm7kb4Nd0CawhRvH-4eO7HIpWjzyYWInegkMT6tiQzcjtrfy9WHeigKeuf9KI3vHiErvN6COZWVI3aOUFm11HFbmBNpj8IvV20am3C-RgWs19_2jcapU5g/s1600/2013-11-21+20.19.27-1.jpg" height="320" width="240" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
There are tumour cells with different degrees of stemness, cells at different states of the cell cycle, different proliferative potential, expresion of Beta-catenin...and that is before we even start considering the microenvironment of the tumour (access to oxygen, other cells, that is, non-tumour cells...). Could it be the reason why not all patients respond the same way to the, otherwise very successful imatinib? I think there is a good chance that heterogeneity could be behind that. Let's now see if our clinicians at Moffitt (or maybe elsewhere) can give us a information we could use to correlate CML heterogeneity and response to imatinib. </div>
David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-86952967782147808012013-12-18T01:00:00.000+01:002013-12-18T01:00:08.432+01:00Can (computational) models be trusted?As a computational modeller I am part of a group of people doing science in a way that was impossible only a few decades ago. A lot of computational modelling combines some of the features of <b>theoretical work</b> (finding out the essential elements of the reality that needs to be captured and creating a computational representation of it) with <b>experimental work</b> (using the computer model as surrogate of the reality to be studied to quickly and exhaustively use it for experiments). Here is an example where Ziv Frankenstein (working with <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/109422830104234532994" target="_blank">+Alexander Anderson</a> , <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/102363485865053745716" target="_blank">+Simon Hayward</a> , <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/108246045857890349141" target="_blank">+Gus Ay</a> and myself) has captured what we thought were some of the essential cellular and microenvironmental players in prostate cancer progression and used that to study how the microenvironment of the tumour can help explain how the tumour evolves.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgb8j7P6HqpgY30w2lBEVHpTjuAkDNOO3aazyKg-ZvwvC1TwgCKVmdO_ipAxCJL76YPrIOt02lt_P7OUVqvSIkSIY03M9OBMYc4guKh57ilQ1dZEjHuoQDtGnRqK0-LkZTZR53rRKkYji4/s1600/simul.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="187" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgb8j7P6HqpgY30w2lBEVHpTjuAkDNOO3aazyKg-ZvwvC1TwgCKVmdO_ipAxCJL76YPrIOt02lt_P7OUVqvSIkSIY03M9OBMYc4guKh57ilQ1dZEjHuoQDtGnRqK0-LkZTZR53rRKkYji4/s320/simul.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
This week Aeon magazine published <a href="http://aeon.co/magazine/world-views/should-we-trust-scientific-models-to-tell-us-what-to-do/" target="_blank">this piece</a> by Jon Turney where he asks whether we should trust computational models at all. Computational models allow us to explore very complicated scenarios that would be impossible to study otherwise. The issue the article raises is whether we are beginning to rely too much on these computer models. This is a genuine concern, in some fields (I think <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/101780559173703781847" target="_blank">+Artem Kaznatcheev</a> might agree with me that social sciences could be one of those) experiments are really hard and the data scarce. This means that the computational models will have to be either too abstract (limiting the detail predictive power of the model) or risk having to make too many assumptions about aspects that are not clear (and thus leading to wrong predictions).</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Bottom line: computational models are extraordinarily useful but depend on having good data and good understanding of what is being studied. We are much better of for having the ability to use them but be careful of detailed predictions when little is known for they are likely to be just guesses.</div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-27523548174475281372013-11-27T04:31:00.001+01:002013-11-27T05:15:31.571+01:00Introducing mathematical oncology to cancer biology and medical studentsThis Wednesday, as I did last year ago, I am helping with a lecture series entitled <i>Modern Basic Tools of Research</i> at the <a href="http://www.moffitt.org/" target="_blank">Moffitt Cancer Center</a>. Last year's was a pleasurable experience and for 2h we talked about different ways to model growth in tumours. First with growth laws describing population change over time (examples of those laws can be found <a href="http://chemoth.com/tumorgrowth" target="_blank">here</a>), then with more mechanistic models where the dynamics of the tumour growth emerge from the way that different cells interact with each other and with their environment.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/4/20130020/F6.medium.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="155" src="http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/4/20130020/F6.medium.gif" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
This year going that far will be more difficult: my 2h have been reduced to 30m. Thus I am trying to change the focus of the lecture and maybe limit my ambitions. Interestingly this could be a blessing in disguise since I might be forced to try to figure out what is the essence of mathematical modelling of cancer and explain that to smart people that do not have a background (or maybe not even an interesting) in mathematical modelling.<br />
<br />
And why 30m this year? Because due to time constraints, the same 2h lecture slot will be used to teach about<u> biostatistics, bioinformatics and mathematical modelling</u>. And that is good: since I have been working in this field every biologist and medical professional I met expected me to be a statistician after describing myself as a mathematical oncologist. This is going to be a great opportunity to explain what we have in common but also the ways in which we work differently.<br />
<br />
Hoping to not misrepresent excessively what biostastisticians and bioinformaticians do (expect a line saying UPDATE at the end of this post very soon!), their work is incredibly useful to both cancer biologists and doctors since it allows them to figure out what the data says about a specific biological process or clinical trend. It also allows them to know whether that trend or pattern is meaningful or not or whether they have collected enough experimental points or clinical data to make any statement about it.<br />
<br />
The best part is that all that extra information usually comes at very little cost to the experimentalists. Mathematical oncologists on the other hand, we tend to be somewhat more difficult to work with since we need to have an understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning the cancer we are studying. We, for instance, take a look at the diagram after the first paragraph and think: do all these cell interact with each other? if so how? these tumour cells, are they all the same? where do they come from? do they come alone or together? do they usually arrive in the neighbourhood of the other cells in the diagram? if not, do they sit and wait? Maybe some of the questions would be part of the conversation between experimentalists and but many of them seem to arise when mathematical and computational modellers are involved. When implementing these ideas into a computer, ambiguities are not an option. Ideas that might work in your mind or mine come crashing down when subjected to the cold logic of a computer.<br />
<br />
It takes time.<br />
<br />
The advantage? We can test new hypotheses, generate novel ones, get molecular, clinical, cellular data and integrate it into the model, we can get all those single cell level measuraments and feed them directly into the model, we can take all these population level experiments and figure out what hypothesis explain them better. We can use that to understand the biology of the cancer, to design new biological experiments, to predict better clinical treatments, to hypothethise how new ones would impact patients in the clinic.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoPBcD8pXoUuvIyxbuVpIZdaVJoJrpI71z1gfthynzGk34PDlwQUDfhFh-cVl9w4irZWQN-WjV0gCOkomru7LaePkZW8zWojKc3PS4G-6sL-Vhi9jRQN3T8BZgb1iHWlqdnBi-QhT0snc/s1600/BD2K+figure+v7.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoPBcD8pXoUuvIyxbuVpIZdaVJoJrpI71z1gfthynzGk34PDlwQUDfhFh-cVl9w4irZWQN-WjV0gCOkomru7LaePkZW8zWojKc3PS4G-6sL-Vhi9jRQN3T8BZgb1iHWlqdnBi-QhT0snc/s320/BD2K+figure+v7.jpg" width="279" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
If you are an experimentalist you should know that using mathematical model will require you to work in a different way, to ask different questions and to view of your research with different lenses but it is worth it.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
By the way, all the figures in the post have been crafted by our very own <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/112812578668566513622" target="_blank">+Arturo Araujo</a> .</div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-74310174844809366932013-09-02T18:13:00.001+02:002013-09-02T18:14:47.466+02:00Pint of Science<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/112812578668566513622" target="_blank">+Arturo Araujo</a> and myself think that our mission as scientists consists, not only in producing new and interesting discoveries, not only contributing to research a cure to cancer but also in making sure that the society at large understands the nature of what we do and the implications of our work.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtTTw1dgGr-LT33S_oz1FOnnNHWFptUHVSrL2nUBrMxmpDL_1LgjuqWheWW53lshzYK6WHPzy1Cv-foxiKiVOVaLtg6jG9ohcR5sUxeop_SyyFtla_C-BSJrY56-8GZP1E-VxSflGaQA4/s1600/PoSUS.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtTTw1dgGr-LT33S_oz1FOnnNHWFptUHVSrL2nUBrMxmpDL_1LgjuqWheWW53lshzYK6WHPzy1Cv-foxiKiVOVaLtg6jG9ohcR5sUxeop_SyyFtla_C-BSJrY56-8GZP1E-VxSflGaQA4/s320/PoSUS.png" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Is for that reason that, together with <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/104836752683068899413" target="_blank">+Angela Rey</a>, we jumped into the opportunity to help <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/101887296087883876067" target="_blank">+Parmvir Bahia</a> start <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/106971447544366844221" target="_blank">+Pint of Science US</a> , and offshoot of the UK based <a href="http://www.pintofscience.com/" target="_blank">Pint of Science</a>, but with a twist: that we will produce regular meetings and podcasts where people in Tampa and beyond will have the chance to interact with our local scientists.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The first of these events will take place tomorrow at <a href="http://newworldbrewery.net/" target="_blank">The New World Brewery</a> in Ybor City and will feature a friend and colleague at <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/112560198298830276761" target="_blank">+Moffitt Cancer Center</a> 's IMO: <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/107832620883409249821" target="_blank">+Jacob Scott</a>. So science, medicine and mathematics will be the ingredients for tomorrow's event at 7pm (9/3/2013). Come if you can, more details at <a href="http://pintofscience.us/" target="_blank">Pint of Science US</a>.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0Tampa, FL, USA27.950575 -82.45717760000002327.5019215 -83.102624600000027 28.3992285 -81.811730600000018tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-87307345588345820622013-07-29T17:33:00.002+02:002013-07-29T17:58:53.201+02:00The story of a paperTogether with my good friend and collaborator <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/107832620883409249821" target="_blank">+Jacob Scott</a> and our new collaborator <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/101780559173703781847" target="_blank">+Artem Kaznatcheev</a> , we have recently wrote (what I hope you will find) an interesting paper where we explored one of older games (emergence of motility in tumours mostly made of rapidly proliferating cells) and studied what happened when cells grow and reach an edge or a boundary. Normally I would try to recapitulate how did we do our work and what the results are but this time I do not need to bother since my collaborators are so much faster and better than me at this.<br />
<br />
For a story of how this work started and how we did this work take a look at <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/107832620883409249821" target="_blank">+Jacob Scott</a>'s latest <a href="http://cancerconnector.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-visitor-resulting-hackathon-and-nice.html" target="_blank">post</a>.<br />
<br />
The work itself has been described in detail by <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/101780559173703781847" target="_blank">+Artem Kaznatcheev</a> on his own blog in the following <a href="http://egtheory.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/edge-effects-in-solid-tumours/" target="_blank">post</a>. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8TZ-WlX8TVo/UeM0MbalepI/AAAAAAAAb-k/YZCq8E10_2Y/s1600/2013-07-12+14.18.54.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8TZ-WlX8TVo/UeM0MbalepI/AAAAAAAAb-k/YZCq8E10_2Y/s320/2013-07-12+14.18.54.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-14484973519893602412013-07-26T22:49:00.002+02:002013-07-26T22:49:57.308+02:00Writing grantsUnfortunately, a good deal of the work of a professional biomedical scientist in the US involves writing grants. It might provide a consolation to some to know that almost 100 years ago scientists still had to write grant proposals. I am not sure how many would have looked like this though:<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc3ygKYmVrcieRcY5bcJpR2-ymUNKs9tYOGnLdj0jADjVFo-kv6e3NaWADqcPMfsbJ5KkMlWo97n8b3QNOUYdXjPMTH1Ck9wzcigve5KkK4LWQ6U2Acln5CMoH3u4z-y7MxP_Gsx7OK4M/s1600/WarburgGrant.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc3ygKYmVrcieRcY5bcJpR2-ymUNKs9tYOGnLdj0jADjVFo-kv6e3NaWADqcPMfsbJ5KkMlWo97n8b3QNOUYdXjPMTH1Ck9wzcigve5KkK4LWQ6U2Acln5CMoH3u4z-y7MxP_Gsx7OK4M/s640/WarburgGrant.png" width="630" /></a></div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-5790118123760396422013-07-22T23:47:00.001+02:002013-07-22T23:47:15.807+02:00Dr. Arturo Araujo<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Congratulations to one of our members, Arturo Araujo on switching his Mr. to Dr. having successfully defended his PhD thesis at University College London last week. <br /><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<img border="0" height="300" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6wumCzQ9za5u_9HBu76c7HqST9WHoV19Yxg8eFHTXP-P6iT5AcNAcYcUsOYg-q9PS2_repteZpjOWTjEslxjaVEg_lbah7fV3KeJ3w1Gap1uFTgijge68hIR7HtqI0FDk54rQNWEMn30/s400/photo+(2).JPG" width="400" /> </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
Here we can see <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/112812578668566513622" target="_blank">+Arturo Araujo</a> celebrating with his PhD supervisor <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/110130004815537645936" target="_blank">+Peter Bentley</a> and his examiners <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/109477082719618458142" target="_blank">+Alex Fletcher</a> and <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/108031687426734406821" target="_blank">+Philip Gerlee</a> </div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0Moffitt Cancer Center:, University of South Florida, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive #3057, Tampa, FL 33612, USA28.0646907 -82.4217080999999893.6620242000000012 -123.73030209999999 52.467357199999995 -41.11311409999999tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-67686212648670315842013-07-08T23:38:00.004+02:002013-07-08T23:38:50.797+02:00Exploiting ecological principles to better understand cancer progression and treatmentI talked about this before in Google+ but the paper <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/109422830104234532994" target="_blank">+Alexander Anderson</a> and myself authored at the Royal Society Interface focus is now available for everybody to <a href="http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/4/20130020.full?keytype=ref&ijkey=7bzkPptzWcjLSQv" target="_blank">see</a>. This is a somewhat unconventional type of paper as it is not exactly a research paper, a review paper or an opinion piece but a combination of all those. I must apologise that the article is not in an open access journal but the version in <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2249" target="_blank">arXiv</a> has all the content (even if it's not as pretty as the journal version). Also, at least for some time, the article can be downloaded from Interface Focus [<a href="http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/4/20130020.full.pdf+html" target="_blank">PDF</a>].<br />
<br />
By the way, the visuals of the article, including the following sketch by <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/112812578668566513622" target="_blank">+Arturo Araujo</a> describing the ecosystem of prostate cancer metastasis to bone, are quite impressive I think.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/4/20130020/F6.medium.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="155" src="http://rsfs.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/4/20130020/F6.medium.gif" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-23708345522982628392013-07-07T19:56:00.003+02:002013-07-07T19:56:42.879+02:00More on game theory and the evolution of invasive phenotypes<a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/101780559173703781847" target="_blank">+Artem Kaznatcheev</a> , a colleague at McGill University, has taken an old paper of ours and decided to do further analysis on it. The emergence of invasiveness is one of the hallmarks of cancer progression and space is likely to play a very important role. For that reason, I used both standard evolutionary game theory and cellular automata to see how much our original results would change if space is explicitly considered. The results can be found <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4724">here</a>. Now <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/101780559173703781847" target="_blank">+Artem Kaznatcheev</a> has worked on a <a href="http://egtheory.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/ohtsuki-nowak-transform/">Ohtsuki-Nowak transform</a> so that we could still try to understand the role of space without sacrificing the analytical power of game theory. He blogged about it <a href="http://egtheory.wordpress.com/2013/07/05/motility/">here</a> and the preliminary results look promising. The number of neighbours a tumour cell has impacts the likelihood of motility to emerge in a tumour population. Hope we can learn more about this technique in the next few days now that <a class="g-profile" href="http://plus.google.com/101780559173703781847" target="_blank">+Artem Kaznatcheev</a> is in Florida.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://egtheory.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/metastasis.jpg?w=300&h=200" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://egtheory.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/metastasis.jpg?w=300&h=200" /></a></div>
<br />David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-71005183958334781212013-07-05T21:54:00.000+02:002013-07-05T21:54:07.296+02:00Back to bloggerI am back to blogger! Or to be more precise, we are. When I left blogger a few years ago the idea was to start using a blogging platform that would allow me to share my ideas with likeminded people. That initially was Nature Networks, and eventually Google+. Now we are starting another experiment with blogger, one in which this blog will capture all the news and events related to the <b>CancerEvo</b> group at the Integrated Mathematical Oncology department at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa. Hope to see you all very often around these pages!<br />
<br />
David and the CancerEvo group.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-34014224649164698682007-06-19T21:59:00.000+02:002007-06-19T22:04:54.388+02:00Moving to Nature NetworksDear everybody.<br /><br />From now on this blog is moving to Nature Networks. Find it following <a href="http://network.nature.com/blogs/user/basanta">this link</a>.<br /><br />See you there!David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com45tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-74020093373175612872007-06-12T13:51:00.000+02:002007-06-12T15:55:18.227+02:00Mini workshop in OxfordToday <a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/cmb/People/info/tindall.html">Marcus Tindall</a> has organised a mini symposium (for lack of a better name) for me and the guys here working on mathematical models of cancer to get to know each other. I have given a very small <a href="http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/%7Ebasanta/Oxford07.pdf">presentation</a> [PDF] (<30m) that covers stuff I presented before.<br /><br />From the CMB I got to know the work of:<br /><ul><li><a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/%7Emurrayp/">Philip Murray</a>, who has created a CA model to study the role of the cell cycle in tumours and that is now trying to obtain a continuous model that displays the same behaviour.</li><li><a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/%7Efletcher/">Alex Fletcher</a> who studies hypoxia in tumour development at the sub-cellular scale.</li><li><a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/%7Ejohnston/">Matt Johnston</a> who works with W. Bodmer (whose game theory models have inspired my own work) to study the dynamics of cell populations in a colon crypt in colorectal cancer. His model shows how a homeostatic population could explode by slightly altering some of the paramers.</li><li><a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/cmb/People/info/NatashaLiwebpage.htm">Natasha Li</a> who collaborates with Gatenby to study, using Cellular Automaton and continuous models, the role of glycolysis in tumour invasion and the influence of the stromal environment. This is specially relevant to me since it is one of my two main lines of work at the moment. She mention in her talk that <span style="font-weight: bold;">glycolytic cells are especially sensitive to glucose deprivation</span>.<br /></li><li><a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/%7Ecarterr1/">Rebecca Carter</a> works on multiscale models of fluid and drug transportation in tumours.</li><li>Marcus Tindall gave a brief introduction to his multiscale model of interaction between the cell cycle and cell density.</li></ul>The presentations were all quite short but I hope to hear more from these people in the coming days.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com238tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-44194256925751366982007-06-05T11:37:00.000+02:002007-06-05T12:13:00.317+02:00Queerer than we can supposeI found this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1APOxsp1VFw">video</a> from a Richard Dawkins's talk in which he talks about the strangeness of science.<br /><br />He talks that science is about truth but that our brain is evolved to cope with every day's reality, within the scope of the reality we have to live with. He cites the example that matter is mostly composed of space but we do not perceive it like that since it is more useful for us to perceive it as solid and opaque. He argues that a living being of the size of a neutrino and capable of vision would see matter as mostly empty space only by the nature of the space it inhabits. Similarly, things that look entirely unlikely to us (the existence of life) become inevitable when considering the vast amounts of time and space the universe has been going on compared to the space and time of our human lifetimes.<br /><br />More shockingly to me he claims that humans are more akin to automata than to agents seeking what they consider positive things and avoiding negative things. The reason being that evolutionarily we rather model fellow humans as people with a purpose than as systems made of components whose design and integration we ignore.<br /><br />In any case this is an important issue for scientists and philosophers of science: our brains have evolved for certain purposes and with certain biases and that should impose some limitations and constraints in what things we can understand and how we chose to interpret natural phenomena.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-69015343736269782662007-06-03T20:15:00.000+02:002007-06-03T23:22:37.549+02:00OxfordI will be staying one month at the <a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/cmb/">Centre for Mathematical Biology</a> directed by <a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/%7Emaini/">Philip Maini</a> at the University of Oxford. With a little of luck I will be able to meet people interested in mathematical discrete models of cancer evolution and angiogenesis.<br /><br />In the Centre they have some interesting (and relevant) research lines like "<a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/cmb/Research/index.html#icb">individual and collective behaviour in ecology</a>" and of course "<a href="http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/cmb/Research/index.html#cancer">cancer modelling</a>". The Centre is pioneering (with Arizona's Gatenby and Oxford's Comlab <a href="http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/work/david.gavaghan/">Gavaghan</a>) the idea that glycolytic acidity promotes invasion. Maybe this could be an opportunity to test my hypothesis that this invasion comes in waves.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-17472872720033876972007-06-01T17:18:00.000+02:002007-06-02T10:00:44.537+02:00Talk in GironaI have been <a href="http://iiia.udg.es/show_one_event.php?id_event=11">invited</a> by <a href="http://eia.udg.es/~vehi/eng.htm">Josep Vehi</a> to give a talk about my research at the <a href="http://iiia.udg.es/index.php">institute</a> he directs at the University of Girona.<br /><br />In this talk I have introduced for the first time the game theory model in which I have worked with people in Dresden (Andreas Deutsch, Haralambos Hatzikirou) and Bonn (Matthias Simon) in which I study Gatenby's hypothesis of acid mediated tumour invasion. I have also talked about the Cellular Automata model I have developed with Benjamin Ribba (Lyon) to study the microenvironmental influence in cancer evolution which I have previously presented in Lyon, Dundee and Dresden.<br /><br />The presentation can be found here in <a href="http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~basanta/girona_gt_ca.pdf">PDF</a> format.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-12910952743893031082007-05-29T11:16:00.000+02:002007-05-29T13:06:00.028+02:00cancer and the cell cycleLast Friday I came to the <a href="http://www.mpi-cbg.de/">Max Planck Instute for Cell Biology</a>, at the other side of Dresden, to attend a series of seminars including one from a colleague and friend of mine, Babis Hatzikirou, about the cell cycle.<br /><br />The classical view on the cell cycle can be seen in this picture that I took from Babis's presentation (and which I suspect he took from somewhere else :)):<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br /></span><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYtu-zGS2nz8jYoknAH71d0BwpK23cIdKxIPpAltXdgDf8Y0dwVinA4uEtDekzMEinD1GDMychZUCaH8HWg8ij3ZCxLZkNsWfG2oYvi6yu1gjcB31wmzN3VY9hAFXMDfU2Ayar6N5BLZo/s1600-h/cell_cycle.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYtu-zGS2nz8jYoknAH71d0BwpK23cIdKxIPpAltXdgDf8Y0dwVinA4uEtDekzMEinD1GDMychZUCaH8HWg8ij3ZCxLZkNsWfG2oYvi6yu1gjcB31wmzN3VY9hAFXMDfU2Ayar6N5BLZo/s320/cell_cycle.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5069915665304232418" border="0" /></a>This is quite interesting although not precisely research news. Most of the cell cycle is of course devoted to interphase and only a minority of the time (assuming that the cell is not in arrest mode) is devoted to create a copy of itself (through mitosis and cytokinesis). The cell cycle is controlled by a finely tuned balance of proteins cdc2-cdc13 and a number of checkpoints make sure that before changing the phase of the cell cycle everything is in order. These checkpoints and their associated proteins (such as the famous <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P53">TP53</a>) are quite critical to prevent tumour formation as they impede the growth of cells that need DNA repair.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-20324826123121861482007-05-18T12:32:00.000+02:002007-05-18T13:04:50.544+02:00What science is notFrom an extract of the book <span style="font-style: italic;">The invisible sex: Uncovering the true roles of Woman in Prehistory</span> (review in Nature 3rd of May issue).<br /><br />"science is not truth; it is, instead, a method for diminishing ignorance"David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-2408725304951634502007-05-16T18:01:00.000+02:002007-05-16T19:03:00.064+02:00A 3D model of human breast cancerThis has been covered in a few places like the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6636373.stm">BBC</a> and <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070513101910.htm">ScienceDaily</a>. It seems that some <a href="http://www.cancer.qmul.ac.uk/research/index.html">researchers</a> at Queen Mary College in London have recently come with a non animal 3D human breast cancer model.<br /><br />This is interesting at more than one level. Their research was funded by a research charity (Dr Hadwen Trust) that supports the development of methods that avoid animal experiments. Working with rats is not that satisfactory for ethical reasons and also because there are many cases in which the results of rat experiments cannot be extrapolated to humans (seems we are not so similar in some respects after all). It is also much more realistic than just taking some human cancer cells and studying them on a petri dish.<br /><br />Being capable of performing experiments using realistic 3D models quickly and efficiently is one of the holy grails of theoreticians since it would make experimental validation of our models much easier (confusingly enough what theoreticians call model, eg, equations or computer rules, is not what experimentalists understand as a model, eg. rat, arabidopsis or drosophila). This validation is quite complicated as I have already mentioned in another <a href="http://cancerevo.blogspot.com/2007/03/cost-of-validation.html">post</a>. Making this validation easier and more convenient will go a long way in terms of making our work more reliable and quantitative.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com115tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-70638283849134508292007-05-14T10:16:00.000+02:002007-05-14T12:47:16.852+02:00Somatic and non somatic evolutionMany ecologists study evolution of the non somatic kind. That is, evolution that happens as a consequence of mutations in the germ line of multicellular organisms during reproduction. The evolution of cancer is of the somatic kind. This means that it affects cells of the soma, the ones that are not transmitted to the offspring.<br /><br />Some time ago I got <a href="http://www.sfu.ca/biology/faculty/crespi/pdfs/90-Crespi&SumMersTREE.pdf">this</a> paper from Crespi and Summers (nicely enough, publicly available). I will probably talk about this paper, entitled Evolutionary biology of cancer (and presented to a readership of ecologists) some other time but I liked a table in which they compare somatic and non somatic evolution.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Phenotypic variation</span>. In most ecosystems of multicellular organisms variation is attained through genetic recombination (sexual reproduction) and mutation. In a tumour we also have to consider also genomic instability (a hypothesis by which some individuals have a higher probability of mutation) and epigenetic alteration (the environment also affects the behaviour of cells in ways that could make tumour progression to cancer more or less likely).<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Selection</span>. In most ecosystems it means dealing better with competitors, avoiding predators, parasites and producing many fit successors. In a tumour means being good at competing for resources with other cells (tumour or otherwise), avoiding the immune system and coping with environmental signals designed to maintain homeostasis.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Drift</span>. That is similar in both types of evolution.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Inheritance</span>. In many cases that involves the transmission of genes from parents to offspring through sexual recombination. In tumours there is no sexual reproduction.<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Result</span>. In most ecosystems the result is adaptation across generations. In a tumour the end results is in many cases the death of the individual and thus of all the cells in the body, including the cancer cells.<br /><br />I think that this is a quite interesting and useful comparison of evolution although I am not sure I agree with all the differences suggested. In my view the evolution in a tumour does not differ much from other types of evolution. For instance, epigenetic changes do play a role in other ecosystems asides from cancer. Genetic instability is not a source of variation, genetic mutations are (genetic instability just makes genetic mutations more likely). Also the fact that tumour cells reproduce asexually is not a big difference with more conventional ecosystems. At the end of the day most of the biomass of the planet is made of bacteria that reproduces asexually. What it is true is that as far as we know, the end result of cancer evolution is either the end of the cancer itself or the end of the individual that hosts the cancer and thus the end of the cancer cells. Thus the only way tumour cells have to be <span style="font-weight: bold;">successful</span> is to <span style="font-weight: bold;">evolve</span> in such a way that <span style="font-weight: bold;">the life of the host is not threatened</span> (you can call that tumour sustainable growth).David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-70291873719449389042007-05-09T10:02:00.000+02:002007-05-09T12:23:35.230+02:00Autophagy and cancerThis is a new cellular mechanism I did not know about: autophagy. Nature's issue of April 12th (I am bit behind I know) has an interesting <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7137/full/446745a.html">article</a> in the section Q&A on autophagy and its role in cancer.<br /><br />Autophagy is the process by which cells degrade faulty or redundant components. It is used by cells when they need to reuse molecules for other uses and also it plays an important role in complementing apoptosis. Both apoptosis and autophagy are connected to cell death but in the case of autophagy cell death is not always the outcome although it can be a substitute when the apoptotic mechanism is crippled. In that case the cell literally eats itself to death.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7137/images/446745a-f3.2.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px;" src="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7137/images/446745a-f3.2.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>The image bellow comes from the article. Autophagy has the potential of being useful for cancer supression but also for cancer promotion. The balance is important, too little and you get cell death when the cell cannot produce things it needs by reusing parts of itself. Too much of it and you also get cell death since the cell can eat itself. Altering this balance in a tumour cell could be the source of a new therapy although as usual it is important to remember that cells might evolve mechanisms to avoid the trouble of autophagy, maybe by inactivating the atophagy mechanism all together. Even in that case the tumour cell would be less capable of surviving in situations of stress since it would not be able to recycle material.<br /><br />Autophagy seems to be a mechanism whose precise role in cancer has not been fully studied yet but could be a promising extra target for a multi target therapy that could hinder cancer evolution and growth.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com87tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7387601310536046630.post-91251068545105896972007-05-07T10:49:00.000+02:002007-05-07T12:00:02.020+02:00Evolution and medicineCatriona MacCallum, an editor at PLoS Biology has posted the following <a href="http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0050112">essay</a> (being PLoS, it is available to everybody) about medicine and evolution.<br /><br />According to the article, physicians do not get much of a training in evolution as a method to study the origin of diseases. That is because most of the training of physicists is not to make them good scientists but to make them good at treating patients. Quoting the article: "does a mechanic need to understand the origins, history and technological advances that have gone into the modern motor vehicle in order to fix it?".<br /><br />This approach is not entirely wrong and once can treat things that are the result of an evolutionary process without having to spend too much time studying evolution. A different thing is when the disease is not a result of evolution but they are evolution itself. They never mention cancer in the article but cancer and infectious diseases are clear cases of diseases in which evolution should be dealt with if the disease is to be cured or even contained. Without an understanding of evolution a physician will be unable to understand how the bacteria or cancer cells will react and evolve when a treatment is used or what phenotypical traits are more likely to be evolved and thus cause problems to or be exploited by the medical community.David Basantahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15504719079207200602noreply@blogger.com0